The move signals deepening internal tensions within one of Kenya’s most influential political outfits.
In a letter dated April 2, the party, under the leadership of Chairperson Gladys Wanga, directed Sifuna to appear before its disciplinary committee on April 8.
He is expected to respond to a series of allegations tied to misconduct and actions said to have undermined the party’s unity and direction.
According to the communication, Sifuna is accused of openly contradicting agreed party positions, particularly his vocal opposition to a reported pre election understanding between ODM and President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance.
Party officials argue that such public dissent has created confusion among supporters and weakened the party’s collective voice.
The letter further claims that Sifuna continued to issue statements that conflicted with decisions he had participated in shaping. ODM leadership views this pattern as damaging to discipline and cohesion within its ranks.
It cites provisions of the party constitution, noting that his conduct may have breached expectations placed on senior officials to uphold unity and protect the party’s image.
Beyond public statements, Sifuna is also under scrutiny for allegedly skipping key internal meetings, including a Central Committee session held in February where his removal as Secretary General was discussed. His absence at such critical forums has been interpreted as disregard for internal processes.
Another point of contention is his reported involvement in the Linda Mwananchi initiative, which ODM claims was formed outside official party structures.
The leadership maintains that any political mobilization undertaken without formal approval risks fragmenting the party and confusing its grassroots base.
Sifuna has been cautioned that failure to respond within the stipulated timeline could see the disciplinary process proceed without his input, potentially sealing his fate within the party.
This latest development comes shortly after the Political Parties Disputes Tribunal declined to intervene in the matter.
The tribunal directed both Sifuna and ODM to resolve their differences internally through the party’s dispute resolution mechanisms, emphasizing the need for good faith engagement.
As the April 8 hearing approaches, attention now shifts to whether the two sides can reconcile or if the fallout will mark a significant turning point in ODM’s internal politics.
Tags
Politics